Residents' Corner
ICE-TIME AND SURGERY
from left to right -
Caroline Scott with her brother Ian and her sister
Katherine
Caroline Scott grew up
in Toronto, then attended
Cornell University
in Ithaca, New York for
undergraduate studies
in Biology and Society.
She chose Cornell for its
excellent Biology program
and for its Varsity
Hockey team. "I wanted
science and ice-time".
She went with her cousin
to Ithaca and found "it
was great fun, though
Varsity athletics is a full time job". She continues to play
hockey now with the Orthopaedics Division in the men's
league. "I play Tuesday night with some of the orthopedic
residents and staff, and Wednesday with The Bipolar
Bears team, that includes anesthesia, plastic surgery and
family medicine friends from medical school. It keeps
me in touch and gives me a great workout."
She likes trauma, sports medicine and pediatrics, all
recent rotations in the orthopedics competency-based
curriculum. Her mother is an orthopaedic surgeon at
Scarborough Grace Hospital. She enjoyed the reflective
writing elective with Mount Sinai psychiatrist Allan
Peterkin. "The project was to illustrate CanMeds roles
based on experiences as a medical student – how I
advocated, managed etc. I got more out of my rotations
because of these writing assignments."
She enjoys international research and travelling. "It has
made me a better resident in my own Toronto setting."
She also enjoyed studying HIV medication counseling
in Zambia. She focused on the counselors and the barriers
to their success like communication and compliance
problems. "If there is no transportation, no alarm
clocks, and no feedback on CD4 counts from lab data
to motivate them, patients are less compliant." "I lived
on the University campus and then travelled in Africa to
Zambia, Ethiopia and Tanzania with my cousin." Her
current residency research project involves a needs assessment
of low cost imaging technology in low resource
settings. Her field work will be in Uganda. This is a
continuation of her supervisor Maryse Bouchard's work.
She has studied the effects of sleep deprivation, including
studies in which she participated as a subject. She
learned "not to pull all-nighters," which, though commonly
misconceived as virtuous, are not effective for
study or for patient care. "There isn't a simple solution to
the patients' need for 24 hour care and the harmful effect
of sleep deprivation on resident performance."
M.M.
MICHAEL MACKECHNIE - INTERNATIONAL SURGEON
Michael MacKechnie in Barcelona -Parc Gruel
|
Michael is a second year
resident in the department
of orthopedic surgery.
Born in Seattle WA,
he grew up in the United
States, Great Britain,
and New Zealand before
arriving in Canada. He
attended York University
and graduated from
medical school at McGill
University.
His enthusiasm lies in
the field of global health, an interest which first started
with his work with the Canada International Scientific
Exchange Program (www.cisepo.ca) where he spent
twelve weeks in Jordan working with Jordanian, Israeli
and Palestinian groups, with a special focus on performing
hearing screening in newborn babies. Michael went
on to work with the Canadian Association of Medical
Teams Abroad, where he was a translator for an orthopedic
surgery mission to Quito, Ecuador. He has been
mentored in many of his international endeavors by
Arnold M. Noyek, ENT surgeon at Mt. Sinai Hospital.
Arnold is a very active and internationally engaged surgeon
and humanitarian, the founder of CISEPO, and a
wonderful mentor to generations of young doctors.
Michael became interested in orthopedic surgery as an
undergraduate student when he watched orthopedic surgeons
in Ecuador. These doctors enabled people who had
spent years without the ability to walk to return quickly to
being active members of their communities. In many cases
these patients were from the Ecuadorian Amazon jungle,
and had been unable to leave their houses for years.
Michael's research interests include international health
education. He is presently working on an education video
to teach fracture reduction and casting which he hopes
will be widely available in North America and the developing
world. The technology boom has made interesting
new methods of teaching available around the world.
Michael is also the recent recipient of a Health
Volunteers Oversees Orthopaedics Traveling Fellowship.
He will use this award to spend four weeks on orthopedic
assignment to Malawi in early 2013. He is grateful for
the support and encouragement of his faculty, especially
program director Peter Ferguson, and his co-residents.
Michael plans to use his six months of research time in his
third year of residency to examine the possibility of creating
an orthopedic surgery residency program in Botswana. He
will work with Arnold Noyek, Georges Azzie, and Lucas
Murnaghan at the Hospital for Sick Children.
Following the teaching of Arnold Noyek, Michael also
has an interest in ways that international health can work
towards peace building in conflicted areas such as the
Middle East. "It's Maslow's hierarchy of needs - people
first need food and shelter and health; they next need
safety, then work, all before they can start to actualize
their true potential, and work for peace."
He is close to his parents and three younger siblings,
all in the GTA. His parents run university programs
teaching English as a Second Language, and appear to
have transmitted their nomadic allele of the traveling
gene to Michael. He is in a relationship with Lauren, a
Masters student in pediatric nursing. He runs, golfs and
plays intramural soccer and basketball. The latest book
that he has read is the biography of cancer- "Emperor of
all Maladies" by Siddhartha Mukherjee and "Theodore
Rex", a biography of Theodore Roosevelt. He also enjoys
the Spanish literature of Mario Vargas Llosa.
M.M.
|
The first year General surgery residents must all
complete a mandatory essay on professionalism
during their first year. They hold a competition
and a prize is awarded. As a member of the
Postgraduate Education Committee in General
Surgery, I have been a judge for this competition
and I have been impressed by the quality of the
submissions. I think they should be published
and read by a wide audience.
This year there were 3 excellent thoughtful
entries that shared first prize. The following
essay is one of these.
Alexandra M. Easson
|
Professionalism in Practice
DEALING WITH DEATH
As an eager medical student, I had prepared myself to
tackle the physical and emotional hurdles that would
await me during a general surgery residency. I was
anticipating the complex knowledge base and intricate
technical skills that I would have to try and master. I had
a plan to maintain a good work-life balance despite the
challenging schedules and heavy work load that required
long work hours. I felt that medical school had helped
me cultivate the skills and qualities required to provide
patient-centred care, to honour ethical principles and to
act with professionalism. However, I was not prepared to
be comfortable with death.
One month into residency, I had my first experience
with dying. Mr. S was a 60 year old male who was scheduled
for an elective esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Unfortunately, in the operating theatre, he was found to
have an inoperable tumour as there was evidence of
tumour encasement of the aorta and right atrium, which
was not evident on recent imaging. Our thoracic surgery
staff informed the patient and his family about the intraoperative
findings and recommended getting palliative
care involved. While the patient had come to terms with
his prognosis, the family was optimistic and reluctant to
give up hope. As a result, the patient gave in to his family's
wishes and requested a consult with medical oncology
to discuss the role of chemotherapy.
While recovering from this unfortunate surgery, his
health rapidly declined. He required a gastrostomy tube
for nutritional intake. After only a week in hospital, he
developed a bronchoesophageal and a bronchopleural
fistula. As a result, he developed a right pneumothorax
and severe pneumonia. Treatment was initiated with a
chest tube and broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics.
It was becoming evident that his cancer was rapidly
progressing and that no medical or surgical treatments
could rescue him. I was on call the day his fistulas were
diagnosed. Together with the thoracic surgery fellow,
we prepared for the family meeting. Our goals were
clear; we were to update the family on the clinical status
of the patient, the options available, and the expected
prognosis. We were going to discuss code status, palliative
care involvement, and end of life issues. We had
cleared our schedules to allow for ample time with the
family and reserved the quiet room designated for such
meetings. The fellow I was working with allowed me to
take the lead and begin the conversation. Soon into the
conversation, the patient's daughter began to cry. She
squeezed the hands of her mother, who began to weep
and tremble uncontrollably. Upon witnessing their emotional
burden, I was unable to continue. I froze. I felt a
lump in my throat and that my eyes would soon well up
with tears. I knew that if I continued, they would be able
to sense my sadness. I needed to maintain my composure
so that the focus would not shift to me. But I was no
longer in control.
Luckily, the thoracics fellow was with me. I watched
with amazement and awe as he communicated with
ease. He demonstrated empathy and compassion without
becoming overly emotional, and demonstrated a
high level of professionalism. Whether knowingly or
unknowingly, he used all of the nonverbal and verbal
communications skills we were taught in medical school.
He made appropriate eye contact, demonstrated active
listening, used reflective statements, and summarized
appropriately. In a calm and steady voice, he used his
medical knowledge to explain why further interventions
would be futile. He wasn't afraid of the silent pauses.
He gave them time. He remained composed and patient
while answering all of their questions, and repeated his
responses multiple times using various terms until he was
sure they understood. He went beyond the ethical principles
of informed consent and patient-centred care by
understanding their vulnerability, experiences and fears.
In doing so, he was able to earn their trust. The family
was confident that he was putting their loved one's best
interests first. And so, he was able to ask the difficult
questions surrounding palliative care, comfort measures
and DNR status. He used layman terms to emphasize
the concepts of patient autonomy and advance directives.
From this conversation, the family realized that any
medical or surgical efforts would be prolonging death
and they accepted that comfort care would be in the
patient's best interest.
At the end of five months into residency, I had another
encounter with the discussion of death. Mr. W was
an 83 year old man with known metastatic colon cancer
involving the liver and lungs for which he was receiving
chemotherapy. He presented to the hospital with a
high-grade bowel obstruction with marked dilatation of
his cecum to over 13 cm secondary to a colonic stent
failure. On admission, code status was established and he
was deemed DNR. While in hospital he underwent stent
replacement via interventional radiology, which was
initially thought to be successful. However, while I was
on call that night, I was paged to assess Mr. W for SVT
with a heart rate ranging from 170-200 and increasing
oxygen requirements on nasal prongs. He was otherwise
asymptomatic. After ordering routine investigations for
tachycardia, I checked the stat chest x-ray. I was surprised
to see a moderate amount of pneumoperitoneum.
I reviewed the findings with the senior on home call and
we decided to order a CT scan of his abdomen. The CT
scan confirmed a perforation near the distal site of the
stent placement with moderate free fluid and extraluminal
air. Given his clinical status, age and comorbidities
he was high risk for surgery and the outcomes were poor
given his end stage cancer. It was almost certain that he
would require a stoma. However, the patient's wishes
were uncertain as he was confused. Since I was the only
one in the hospital that night, my senior resident asked
me to communicate the findings to the patient's wife
and discuss the patient's wishes, including the option for
surgical management, the high risk of requiring a stoma,
and to confirm code status, while he informed the staff
surgeon on call.
At first, I was nervous. I was afraid of how the wife
would react and how I would respond to her questions.
This time, however, I was armed with some experience.
I recalled my encounter during thoracics and the salient
features that helped the fellow break bad news. I made
sure I knew all of the medical information, options and
outcomes. I was prepared for the silent pauses and the
emotions and uncertainty that would ensue. I remembered
how important it was to be empathic and to gain
an understanding of the patient and family's wishes,
fears, and concerns. And I realized that even though
there wasn't a fellow by my side, this still wasn't a discussion
I would be having alone with the family. The senior
resident and staff would discuss the prognosis further
in the morning. Social work, the hospital chaplain, and
the family's minister would be available for addition
support and guidance. With this knowledge and experience,
I was comfortable and I didn't lose control. This
encounter came full circle for me when at the end of the
discussion the patient's wife commented on how much
she appreciated the time, care, and ‘good bedside manner'
that I provided.
Most surgeons remain uncomfortable with death, as it
is an outcome they might equate with defeat (1). However,
evidence suggests that students do as their teacher do (2).
And so, with positive role models, professionalism surrounding
‘breaking bad news' can be taught. Dealing
with the concept of death and dying is still not second
nature to me, nor should I ever want it to be. It is not
a routine practice since it is a unique and extreme situation
that each patient and their family are faced with.
It requires compassion, empathy, good communication
and a mutual understanding to reach common goals for
the patient. With the excellent mentorship I received, I
am now more comfortable in my role as a physician and
as a professional during these trying times.
Nathalie Wong-Chong,
PGY1 General Surgery
REFERENCES:
(1) Gruen RL, Arya J, Cosgrove EM, Cruess RL, Cruess SR,
Eastman AB, Fabri RJ, Friedman P, Kirksey TD, Kodner IJ,
Lewis FR, Liscum KR, Organ CH, Rosenfeld JC, Russell
TR, Sachdeva AK, Zook EG, Harken AH: Professionalism
in Surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197; 4; 605-08.
(2) Christian F, Pitt DF, Bond J, Davison P, Gomes A:
Professionalism – Connecting the past and the present
and a blueprint for the Canadian Association of General
Surgeons. Can J Surg 2008; 51; 2; 88-91.
[This is a well described example of the role of near-peer
mentoring. Junior residents often miss the chance to
observe these emotionally charged conversations or stumble
through them unmentored. M.M.]
|